Rather than a passive period of waiting for market recovery, May became a highly active sequence of corporate restructurings, major regulatory developments, and high-profile strategic retreats, all pointing toward the emergence of a leaner and increasingly institutionalised crypto ecosystem

The month began with a major structural shockwave when Coinbase, the largest publicly listed digital asset exchange in the United States, announced a sweeping 14% reduction in its global workforce. The cuts affected approximately 693 employees and are expected to generate up to $60 million in restructuring and severance costs.
Rather than presenting the layoffs purely as a reaction to continued weakness in crypto markets, CEO Brian Armstrong framed the move as part of a broader transition toward an AI-driven operating model.
On the regulatory front, the United States took one of its most significant steps toward formalising crypto regulation in years. The CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) successfully advanced through a key Senate committee markup vote, breaking months of political deadlock surrounding stablecoin yield structures and receiving strong support from crypto advocates such as Senator Cynthia Lummis.
With the US appearing increasingly ready to move beyond its long-criticised “regulation by enforcement” approach, market participants immediately began assessing how the emerging American framework compares with more mature international regulatory regimes.
| Jurisdiction | Framework Status | Core Operational Focus |
| United States (CLARITY / GENIUS Acts) | Advancing / Pending | Moves toward formal federal segregation by cleanly splitting SEC/CFTC oversight. Prioritizes corporate flexibility and a distinct rulebook for stablecoin reserves. |
| European Union (MiCA) | Fully Live | A highly centralized, rule-based regime. Places heavy systemic risk mandates and strict volume caps on non-euro asset-referenced token issuers. |
| Singapore & UAE (MAS / VARA) | Fully Live | Mature, fully operational licensing ecosystems. Enforces rigid on-the-ground asset segregation protocols and active, localized regulatory supervision. |
While the advancing CLARITY Act may finally resolve the long-running jurisdictional conflict between the SEC and the CFTC, comparative analyses published throughout the month highlighted that the United States is still playing catch-up in several critical areas of crypto regulation. Jurisdictions such as the European Union (through MiCA), Singapore (MAS), and Dubai (VARA) already operate under fully implemented exchange licensing regimes and strict local stablecoin reserve frameworks that the US is only now beginning to formalise.
The realities of navigating a difficult public listing environment caught up with Kraken in mid-May. Reports published on 15 May indicated that the major crypto exchange had postponed its highly anticipated US IPO until 2027.
The delay came only four weeks after co-CEO Arjun Sethi publicly stated at the Semafor World Economy event in Washington that the company’s confidential S-1 filing remained fully on schedule. The reversal highlights the growing disconnect between strong operational performance and increasingly cautious public equity markets.
The most dramatic casualty of the changing crypto landscape emerged during the weekend of 17 May, when Bitcoin Depot Inc. officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.
In an immediate liquidation move, the company shut down its entire network of more than 9,000 crypto ATMs worldwide. The announcement triggered a collapse in Bitcoin Depot’s stock price (NASDAQ: BTM), which fell by 72.8% in pre-market trading on Monday, 18 May.
CEO Alex Holmes directly blamed what he described as an unsustainable operating model caused by increasingly restrictive local regulation. Over the past year, several US states imposed tighter transaction limits, expanded compliance obligations, increased consumer remediation requirements, and in some cases introduced outright restrictions on cash-to-crypto services.
Restructuring specialists noted that Bitcoin Depot’s collapse may serve as a warning sign for the broader crypto ATM industry, where rising compliance costs and expensive cash logistics have severely compressed operating margins.
Toward the end of the month, Kraken demonstrated that the industry’s restructuring trend is not only about reducing costs, but also about identifying more scalable and capital-efficient revenue streams. On 27 May, following its acquisition of crypto-native prop trading firm Breakout, Kraken officially launched Kraken Prop, becoming the first major cryptocurrency exchange to directly operate an evaluation-based proprietary trading program.
The move introduces the increasingly popular funded-trading model to the retail crypto market, shifting the focus from capital ownership to trading performance.
| Evaluation-Based Access: Instead of risking personal capital, traders pay a one-time evaluation fee to trade in a simulated environment that mirrors live market conditions. Successful participants gain access to funded accounts ranging from $5,000 to $200,000. |
| Capital-Efficient Structure: Traders receive 80% of generated profits by default, scalable up to 90%, while Kraken maintains limited downside exposure and gains access to high-margin trading activity across more than 60 crypto pairs with leverage of up to 5x. |
| Strategic Positioning: While competitors such as Coinbase focused acquisitions on derivatives infrastructure, Kraken’s acquisition of Breakout positions the exchange to directly capture the rapidly expanding funded-trading segment by leveraging its existing professional trading infrastructure. |
Create your free account today to view the full article. No credit card required.